Fri 19 Jun 2009 by Patrick Kavanaugh
Fri 15 May 2009 by David Naugle
This article is adapted from material in Reordered Love, Reordered Lives: Learning the Deep Meaning of Happiness (Eerdmans 2008).
“There is not any thing in this world, perhaps, that is more talked of, and less understood, than the business of a happy life.” Seneca said this centuries ago, and it is still true today.
Down the ages, the best human thinking has connected our happiness with what we love. What do you love? How do you love the things that you love? What do you expect from the things you love? There aren’t too many questions more important than these. The reason is that what we love makes us who we are. If we love something that cannot sustain the weight of our expectations, or if we love something in the wrong way, such disordered loves will destroy the very happiness we seek and will eventually disfigure us.
Thu 07 May 2009 • Responses: 1 • by Al Sikes
Wed 06 May 2009 • Responses: 7 • by Kelly Soifer
Mon 13 Apr 2009 • Responses: 1 • by Al Sikes
Wed 25 Mar 2009 by TTF Staff
Senior Fellows Vigen Guroian and Prabhu Guptara are among the contributors to “Repossessing Virtue,” a series on the economic crisis broadcast by the American Public Media program Speaking of Faith. A one-hour program with their contributions, among others, ran on March 5 and can be found here. Uncut interviews are also available.
Guroian spoke on February 23 on the crisis of imagination that he sees behind the economic issues; you can listen and download here. (The essay he cites, “On the Choice of a Profession” by Robert Louis Stevenson, is available from Google Book Search and the Internet Archive.)
Guptara was interviewed on December 3; you can listen to his interview (with other helpful links) here
Mon 23 Mar 2009 by TTF Staff
Senior Fellow David Miller was interviewed on March 20 by the PBS show Religion & Ethics Newsweekly. You can watch the segment and read the transcript from this link.
How can we have a culture, a corporate culture that accents character, that accents the common good and not just earnings per share or a penny more per share per quarter? That’s a new culture. Is it possible that companies can make a decent profit—create wealth, create jobs, provide goods and services for society and maybe even be a moral community to develop its people? I think it can, but it will take leadership that’s committed to a new vision.
Fri 20 Mar 2009 by Peter Edman
Alan Jacobs calls our attention to the blog of Douglas Bowman, a lead designer at Google who is leaving that company. Bowman explains his rationale for moving on in a provocative post:
Without a person at (or near) the helm who thoroughly understands the principles and elements of Design, a company eventually runs out of reasons for design decisions. With every new design decision, critics cry foul. Without conviction, doubt creeps in. Instincts fail. “Is this the right move?” When a company is filled with engineers, it turns to engineering to solve problems. Reduce each decision to a simple logic problem. Remove all subjectivity and just look at the data. Data in your favor? Ok, launch it. Data shows negative effects? Back to the drawing board. And that data eventually becomes a crutch for every decision, paralyzing the company and preventing it from making any daring design decisions.
It would be a useful exercise to extend this argument to other fields, notably ethics. Do you find parallel situations in the organizations you lead? How important is it for to leaders to understand the principles by which their organization is run?
Are there situations where you are tempted to rely too much on data—science, polls, market “demands,” what is technically possible—to take the “subjective” factors out of the decision and make sure no one is ultimately responsible for a decision. Is this what causes a “corporate mindset”?
By what standards do you evaluate criticism of yourself or your organization? How do you help other people in your organization understand core principles, whether ethical, operational, or aesthetic?
Thu 19 Mar 2009 by Micah Mattix
Fri 13 Mar 2009 by Cherie Harder
There is no pit so deep that God's love is not deeper still.
Corrie ten Boom, The Hiding Place
How Much Land Does a Man Need? (Audio) by Leo Tolstoy, foreword by Os Guinness.
David Aikman narrates this Trinity Forum Reading selection that helps us think about greed, money, and success.
Embracing Our Creative Limitations
Patrick Kavanaugh
Faith, on the evidence
Al Sikes
Travels with Charley—and God
Kelly Soifer
Choosing a New Way
Al Sikes
The Romance of Socialism
Micah Mattix
Integrity in Science
Cherie Harder
The Selfish Gene Delusion
Nicholas Beale
Sunday Mornings
Al Sikes
Guroian and Guptara on Speaking of Faith
Miller interviewed on Corporate Morality
Seed Corn and Spiritual Capital
Aitken on McDonald in the American Spectator
Let all mortal flesh keep silence
The Case for Working With Your Hands: “There probably aren’t many jobs that can be reduced to rule-following and still be done well. But in many jobs there is an attempt to do just this, and the perversity of it may go unnoticed by those who design the work process.” (Matthew Crawford, The New York Times • 2009 06 04)
Wanda Sykes, Al Franken and the Politics of Incivility: “So civility has an unavoidably moral component. The proper treatment of others conveys regard and demonstrates self-control. Rudeness sets out to dominate and humiliate. . . . Why does politics seem to numb this rudimentary moral sense?” (Michael Gerson, The Washington Post • 2009 05 15)
The Threat of Culture: Senior Fellow William Edgar: “Does the perversion of culture mean that the problem is culture itself? Although there are Christians who defend such a view, it is far off the mark…. It is never enough simply to decry the evils of the world, and then to offer salvation either as a way of warring against culture or as an escape from the world. In his Mars Hill speech, Paul reminds his listeners of the original purpose of history. God is the maker of the world and everything in it. He is to be worshiped as such.” (Gospel & Culture Project • 2009 03 25)
The New Humanism: Senior Fellow Roger Scruton: “The new humanism spends little time exalting man as an ideal. It says nothing, or next to nothing, about faith, hope, and charity; is scathing about patriotism; and is dismissive of those rearguard actions in defense of the family, public spirit, and sexual restraint that animated my parents. Instead of idealizing man, the new humanism denigrates God and attacks the belief in God as a human weakness. My parents too thought belief in God to be a weakness. But they were reluctant to deprive other human beings of a moral prop that they seemed to need.” (The American Spectator • 2009 03 25)
• Knowing and finding (2009 03 20)
• Obama’s Prayer Warriors (2009 03 18)
• How Science Fiction Found Religion (2009 03 11)
• Science and the Obama Administration (2009 03 05)
• The Triumph of Banality (2009 03 04)
The Face of Truth: Lifting the Veil by William Edgar.
In this volume, William Edgar seeks to answer the questions: Can God be known? Hasn’t science disproved the Bible? How can a good God allow evil? Aren’t all religions pretty much the same?
Recent Responses
Robert K. Morris on “Faith, on the evidence”: Many folks claim that faith is disjoint from knowledge. No! In a great 1920s book,"What IS Faith?", J. Gresham Machen…
Kelly on “Travels with Charley—and God”: Mark, I think it's a tricky balance of engaging in what is going on in the world - being salt…
Mark A. Sam on “Travels with Charley—and God”: You stated in your article, "Lest I seem to vilify him, I must admit that I connect with him in…
Kelly Soifer on “Travels with Charley—and God”: Thanks to each of you for the comments. I believe so many authors - if not all, at some level…