Prabhu Guptara blogging
Mon 11 Jul 2005 by TTF Staff
Senior Fellow Prof Prabhu Guptara is maintaining a blog on business and spirituality, among several other topics.
His blog is titled “Renaissance: Insights for Action in Today’s World.” Here is a recent snapshot from an interview, answering a question of the recent seeming fad relating spirituality and business:
Fads can be good and useful as well as useless and even horrible! But at least some of the reasons for the fad are negative ones, in that the impact of evolution in the West tore many people away from their spiritual roots in Christianity and the Bible. Now the children and grandchildren of these people are discovering that atheism may be fine as a means of protest against hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty, but atheism provides no answers regarding how to live as an individual or family or how to conduct business or political life - so spirituality is coming back.
Cromartie to Chair USCIRF
Mon 11 Jul 2005 by TTF Staff
The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) has elected TF Senior Fellow Michael Cromartie to serve as Chair for 2005-2006.
News release is here. Congratulations, Mike!
Daedalus and Icarus
Wed 06 Jul 2005 by Peter Edman
Our forthcoming technology curriculum includes a section from Bertrand Russell’s Icarus, Or, the Future of Science.
Icarus was written in 1924 in response to a 1923 published lecture by JBS Haldane, Daedalus, Or Science and the Future. The debate between these two great men of science is reconsidered in the Spring 2005 issue of The New Atlantis by Charles T. Rubin.
The real argument is about the meaning of and prospects for moral progress, a debate as relevant today as it was then. Haldane believed that morality must (and will) adapt to novel material conditions of life by developing novel ideals. Russell feared for the future because he doubted the ability of human beings to generate sufficient “kindliness” to employ the great powers unleashed by modern science to socially good ends.
Both authors explore the problem of relating moral and technological progress with sufficient depth that we would benefit by reexamining this debate with a view to our own time. But the manner in which they frame the problem stands in the way of articulating a clear moral goal that might serve as progress’s purpose and judge. With serious ethical discussion thus sidelined, technological change itself becomes the fundamental imperative, despite the reasonable doubts both Haldane and Russell have concerning its ultimate consequences. And while Haldane is more loath to acknowledge it than Russell, the net result of their debate is a tragic view of mankind’s future, marked by an irreconcilable and destructive mismatch between our aspiration to understand nature and the power we gain from that knowledge.
James Stockdale, RIP
Wed 06 Jul 2005 by Peter Edman
Speaking of out-of-print Readings, in response to the news this morning of the death of Adm. James Stockdale (1923–2005), here is a quote from his essay “The World of Epictetus,” which appeared in The Atlantic 241 (April 1978): 98-106.
Stockdale was a philosopher, professor, vice-presidential candidate, Navy admiral, prisoner of war, and recipient of the Medal of Honor. May he rest in peace. The World of Epictetus was the fifth Trinity Forum Reading; Os Guinness wrote the foreword and Admiral Stockdale kindly granted us reprint permission.
When I ejected from the airplane on that September morn in 1965, I had left the land of technology. I had entered the world of Epictetus, and it’s a world that few of us, whether we know it or not, are ever far away from.
Dallas Willard on Ethics
Wed 06 Jul 2005 by TTF Staff
Senior Fellow Dallas Willard is quoted in an article on ethical lapses among leaders in the Christian Science Monitor.
In an article of 6 July 2005, “It’s All Good, Boss!,” correspondent G. Jeffrey MacDonald (whose article has several good insights and quotes from others as well), sets up his dilemma so:
Though everyone struggles to recognize his or her own ethical lapses, the task of catching one’s own errors in judgment becomes especially challenging for high achievers, whether they run major companies or head up a small household. Reasons are several, but one looms largest: People in authority tend to lack the honest input that everyone needs to maintain a moral life.
Dr. Willard is quoted offering a positive vision of calling and moral accountability as a counterpoint to a more traditional perspective that sees ethical dilemmas as only shades of gray.
The Essence of Christian Humanism
Tue 05 Jul 2005 by Peter Edman
While updating things for our Online Store this morning, I had to mark a Reading as out-of-print (Amazing Grace) and was reminded of the other Readings that have sold out and that we’ve decided for various reasons not to reprint.
One of those is “You Are the Man,” the second Reading we ever did, an excerpt from sociologist Peter Berger’s book The Precarious Vision: A Sociologist Looks at Social Fictions and Christian Faith (Doubleday 1961) with a foreword by Os Guinness. Os wrote:
Unquestionably, our greatest challenge is not the fictions of totalitarian tyrannies or of Western consumer fantasies. It comes from the rationalizations of our own minds, the fictions of our own imaginations, and the deceptions of our own hearts. “Living in truth” is a prerequisite of personal integrity before it is one of public life. All of us who do not wish to be exposed some day should live by submitting ourselves to truth every day. The way of faith turns the way of the world upside down. Instead of concealing our worst and revealing our best, we are called to do the reverse. After all, as Jesus taught and modern psychology underscores, we are our secrets, not our PR. It is truth in the hidden life that counts. The story of David is worth pondering.
Congratulations, CT!
Fri 01 Jul 2005 by Peter Edman
Christianity Today, one of the more important evangelical Christian magazines, has an editorial out on the public portrayal of evangelicals in the U.S. media.
“We’re Prime Time, Baby!” (July 2005) notes that evangelicals are being treated with more even-handedness by the news side of the media (not the opinion side, to be sure), and suggests some responses in light of that, including this one:
Second, as noted, we really can’t play the persecution card anymore. As “players,” we will be criticized sharply still, but that’s just part of life in America.
This is extremely encouraging to hear. Publicly claiming to be a persecuted minority may have been a good fund-raising strategy, but it has never been legitimate. It’s well past time for evangelicals to leave it behind.
Loconte on the Religious Left
Thu 30 Jun 2005 by Peter Edman
Moderator Joe Loconte has an article in the Wall Street Journal for 1 July 2005 on the latest resurgence of politically liberal Christians.
In “From Gospel to Government,” Loconte discusses the current “Christian Alliance for Progress” and gives some context from recent history.
It proffers an agenda “founded firmly on the teachings of the Gospel.” Some students of the Gospel may be surprised at how neatly such an agenda fits the Democratic Party platform . . .
They can at least be comforted that they are not alone—the sermon from Tom Wright I linked to earlier included comments that in the UK, the people pushing for religion in public life are more on the left.
Loconte helps me articulate something I’ve been struggling with for a few weeks now:
N. T. Wright on Tolerance and the People of Faith
Thu 30 Jun 2005 by Peter Edman
Bishop N. T. Wright’s sermon at the end of the Anglican Consultative Council meeting deserves a wider hearing than just Anglicans.
Wright, an eminent New Testament historian and Bishop of Durham who has moderated Trinity Forum sessions in Europe, spoke on 28 June 2005. Particularly if you haven’t been aware of his thinking before, take the time to read this through very carefully.
“Shipwreck and Kingdom: Acts and the Anglican Communion” (one source text is here) includes an ironic discussion of the politics of left and right, but is particularly thought-provoking on the concept of “tolerance” and the truth-claims that underlie the Christian faith—and all other faiths, for that matter. Faith is not a matter of personal opinion, and those who say otherwise have their own not-so-hidden agendas.
But when you are in Caesar’s world, where truth comes out of the barrel of a gun, or in his day the sheath of a sword, tolerance can simply be a fancy name for cowardice. The claim that ‘Jesus is Lord’ was never, in the first century, what we would call a religious claim pure and simple. There was no such thing as religion pure and simple. It was a claim about an ultimate reality which included politics, culture, commerce, family life and everything else you could think of. . . .
And if you stop saying ‘Jesus is Lord’ out of deference to the private opinions of your friends and neighbours, Caesar smiles his grim smile and extends his empire by one more street. After all, the great eighteenth-century virtue of tolerance was developed not least by those who were keen on extending their geographical or industrial empires, and who didn’t want God breathing down their necks to stop them. Keep religion in the private sphere and we’ll run the public square. And to that idea Luke says a clear No; and so must we.
More on tolerance and its implications:
Mansfield on Brann, or, Why read the classics
Mon 27 Jun 2005 by Peter Edman
Harvard prof Harvey Mansfield has an article in The Weekly Standard on the work and latest book of Eva Brann of St. John’s College, Annapolis.
The piece is entitled “Greek Books, American Life,” (20 June 2005). It’s an interesting appreciation and critique, implying that her devotion to deep study in the Greek and other classics may be undermined by an American tendency to skim over the stuff that’s hard or irritating.
Of course, that’s not always a bad way to read people like Nietzsche, says Brann, in Open Secrets/Inward Prospects: Reflections on Word and Soul. Worth noting for a good assessment of Jefferson vs. Madison, and for the following quote.
