America’s Religious Supermarket

a columnDavid Aikman

logo

If anyone doubted that America has become a national supermarket of different world religions, with people changing brands at a dizzying pace, they need doubt no more. A new survey by one of the country’s most prestigious research organizations, the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, shows how rapidly and dramatically the religious scene in the U.S. is changing. The U.S. Religious Landscape Survey was conducted during the spring and summer months in 2007, and involved interviews with no fewer than 35,000 Americans.

The basic outline of the landscape is not so new to those who have studied the American religious scene in the recent past. Though 78.4 percent of adult Americans (according to U.S. Census Bureau estimates, in late February 2008 the total estimated U.S. population was 303.5 million people) describe themselves as Christian in some category or other, Protestants, the majority religion of Americans for most of our history, may soon be a minority. Today, they hold onto a narrow majority of 51.3 percent. Catholics comprise 23.9 percent and Evangelicals, a sub-category of Protestants, a robust 26.3 percent of American adults.

So far, no great surprises. But what the Landscape Survey makes starkly clear is how rapidly Americans are changing their religious affiliations. An amazing 28 percent have abandoned the faith in which they were raised in favor of another religion, or even of secularism. Though the total percentage of Americans describing themselves as “atheist” or “agnostic” is only 4 percent, an amazing 44 percent of all adults say they had switched their religious affiliation as adults, either dropping out of religion altogether, or changing their faiths. A solid 12.1 percent of the adult population described their religion as “nothing in particular.” Presumably, in the American religious supermarket, they haven’t made up their minds whether to forage in the meat aisle or the breakfast cereal one.

The biggest decline in Christian denominations was experienced by the Catholic Church. Though one in three Americans was raised as a Catholic, only one in four today identifies himself or herself as a Catholic. Jews remain 1.7 percent of the adult population but Muslims still number barely half of one percent—in fact, 0.6 percent. As many previous studies have noted, Jews are much more likely to have a post-graduate degree and to earn more than the general American population, but their achievement is actually overshadowed by that of American Hindus. Nearly half of all Hindus in the U.S. have obtained advanced degrees, compared with one third of Jews and only one tenth of the general population. There are even fewer Hindus than Muslims, only 0.4 percent of adults. Interestingly, Buddhists, who at 0.7 percent of the population are more numerous than Hindus and Muslims, are primarily made up not of immigrants, as might be supposed, but are home-grown.

Political analysts of both major parties are sure to pore over this survey for clues how to present their political candidates most effectively to this faith supermarket. They had better decide soon how to proceed. The faith landscape itself is changing in front of our eyes.  

Dr. Aikman, a Senior Fellow of the Trinity Forum, was for many years senior correspondent for Time.

1 Responses (comments are closed) • Columns, David Aikman, Faiths and Worldviews, Religious Liberty, Society, Fri 07 Mar 2008

Comments and Responses
By Rev. J. David McGuire
Claremore, OK
on 2008 03 17

Great intelligent discussions. I’m glad to have come this way!

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

Character may be manifested in the great moments, but it is made in the small ones.

Phillips Brooks

Responses on this Article

Rev. J. David McGuire: Great intelligent discussions. I’m glad to have come this way!

Site Services

Search:

Advanced Search

Member Login

Join the Site

Forgotten your password?

Send this Article to a Friend

Print this Article

Print without Comments

Recent Articles

Lebanon on the Brink

A Cultural Manifesto and Showcase

Steep Trajectory

McClay at the White House

Johnston on Speaking of Faith

China, Tibet, and the Olympics

A Tale of Temptation for Our Times

A Brief Chat with Screwtape

Christ for Culture

Obama’s ‘Bitter’ Comments

Featured Resource from the Fellows

Cover image via AmazonThe Delusion of Disbelief: Why the New Atheism is a Threat to Your Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness by David Aikman.

Aikman offers a reasoned response to four writers at the forefront of today’s anti-faith movement: Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Christopher Hitchens.

Gleanings Quick Links

Orthodoxy: Georgetown’s Father Schall reviews G. K. Chesterton’s Orthodoxy on its 100 year anniversary. “In coming to believe in Christianity, Chesterton, as he tells us, did not read a single Christian book in the process. Rather, he read book after book of those who maintained that Christianity could not possibly be true. After he had read many of these tractates, he suddenly realized that the intellectual opponents of Christianity were constantly contradicting themselves about what they were opposing. Chesterton, the most logical of men, figured that anything so odd as to be opposed for the exact opposite reasons must either be quite strange or, in fact, rather normal and true.” A helpful introduction to a lovely book. (James V. Schall, SJ, InsideCatholic.com , 2008 05 05)

Where Were Obama’s Friends?: Friendship under fire: “As for the supersized candidates, what strikes one most about them is their ‘aloneness.’ They look so solitary. Indeed, it is possible that the old and honorable notion of ‘standing with’ a candidate like Obama simply didn’t occur to his famous supporters this week. Everyone has become used to watching celebrity stars and athletes take it in the neck on their own. Even someone running for the nation’s presidency looks like just another personal crack-up.” Makes one pause.  (Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal , 2008 05 01)

There’s no way you’re going to convince me: Catholic professor Scott Carson covers the current debates on evil between N T Wright and Bart Ehrman on Beliefnet: “[H]aving had a look at this most recent exchange I have to say that it continues to astound me how simplistic and thoughtless the popular treatment of the problem has become. . . . It’s as if generations of sophisticated and complex theological and philosophical argument amount to nothing when compared to the emotional attitudes of a single individual living in a highly particularized time and place. . . . Just as atheists and agnostics are often—perhaps way too often—tempted to assume that believers only believe for emotional or psychological reasons, so too, it seems rather obvious to me, every non-believer almost certainly has emotional and psychological reasons for not believing that will trump any and every legitimate argument posed against them.” (extensive links from the article to the primary sources) (An Examined Life , 2008 04 27)

The Way We Weren’t: “The fifties really were a time when the culture broadly affirmed Christianity as a Good Thing. I was there. I saw it; I heard it. And yet some kind of demurral is strongly indicated: some sign of recognition that no human society, whatever its good intentions and methods, has lived unburdened, unencumbered by the crushing weight of human fallenness. Good as life may appear to have been in the cities and universities of France and Italy in the thirteenth century, or amid the sweaty fervor of the camp meetings in nineteenth-century America, or among the fierce faith of the emancipators, always human pride and general nuttiness were there to spoil the broth.” (William Murchison, in Touchstone , 2008 04 23)

Not on Sale (2008 04 14)
Seven New Deadly Sins, Suitably Updated (2008 04 10)
The Pope Comes to America (2008 04 09)
Both Read the Same Bible (2008 04 09)
Muslims Outnumber World’s Catholics (2008 03 31)

more . . .