Joseph Loconte
Though painfully overdue, a leading human-rights organization has finally focused serious and sustained attention on a leading human-rights abuser: China. In a scathing report released ten days before the Olympic Games in Beijing, Amnesty International has concluded that China “continues to persecute and punish” those who advocate for human rights and democratic reform.
The 17-page report, “The Olympics Countdown: Broken Promises,” notes some positive steps taken by the government in Beijing. Nevertheless, it describes continuing abuses, including detention without trial, the persecution of rights activists, and the lack of media freedom. “In fact, the crackdown on human rights defenders, journalists and lawyers has intensified because Beijing is hosting the Olympics,” the report notes. “The authorities have stepped up repression of dissident voices in their efforts to present an image of ‘stability’ and ‘harmony’ to the outside world.”
There are an estimated 500,000 people in China under punitive detention without charge or trial—yes, at least half a million. Meanwhile, millions more cannot access the legal system to seek redress for their grievances. Now compare this system of institutionalized repression to the seething controversy over the 265 or so detainees at Guantanamo Bay. Most of the detainees are suspected terrorists apprehended during the U.S.-led war in Afghanistan. The U.S. military considers 120 of the detainees to be too dangerous to release, but lacks the evidence to try them. There are important human-rights questions surrounding Guantanamo Bay, as the recent Supreme Court ruling on detainees suggests. Yet the barbarism of Islamist radicals—their thirst to acquire weapons of mass destruction, their willingness to pose as civilians on the battlefield, and their indiscriminate killing of women and children—makes the struggle against them a moral obligation, with all its ambiguities.
Too many critics of the United States have lost sight of these facts. They forget that oppressive states such as Communist China have been engaged in a contest not against terrorism, but against the democratic norms of free speech, freedom of association, and, most importantly, freedom of religion. Political and religious liberals fulminate over America’s “tarnished image” in the world, but remain shamefully mute as hundreds of thousands languish in Chinese prisons because they dared to assert their natural rights.
Amnesty International deserves credit for its China report, even if it produces only a spasm of conscience and clarity among America’s cultured despisers.
Fodder, Good and Evil, Religious Liberty, Joseph Loconte, Tue 29 Jul 2008
Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away.
Philip K. Dick
Poor Man’s Earl (Audio): an introduction to Lord Shaftesbury, the great reformer by John Pollock, foreword by Os Guinness.
David Aikman narrates this exclusive Trinity Forum Reading selection that helps us think about the connection between privilege and responsibility.
The Institutionalization of Greed
John Piper explains Why Calvinists are so Negative: This, with the item below from Frederica, offer two timely perspectives on appropriate humility—which could also be approached with profit from the perspective of strategy. “I must tell you that whenever I have had a profound experience of God through reading his word or encountering God in worship or community, it tends to just humble me, and make me want to say something like what Joni Mitchell said about love—‘it’s love’s illusions I recall; I really don’t know love, at all.’ I have barely touched the hem of the Master’s garment, I hardly know him though I long to know him better. In the face of the divine-human encounter, even Barth’s Dogmatics appear to be little more than a good start to understanding God.” (New Testament scholar Ben Witherington III • 2008 11 19)
Confessions of an Obnoxious Orthodox: Salutary. “Most people like to be polite and get along, so they highlight our commonalities. But every church must have its distinctiveness, or we’d all be in the same church. At the time, I was so occupied with comprehending this strange thing called Orthodoxy that I emphasized the differences, and was impatient with kindly big-tent suggestions.” (Frederica Mathewes-Green, Beliefnet • 2008 11 19)
Finding Home: A worthwhile meditation on place: “My parents have moved a lot in their lives, and view towns and cities as places to go for opportunities, not places to live for love of the place itself. They still pressure us occasionally to move closer to them. Maybe someday we will; as I said above, I know I would find things to love wherever we lived. But after all the moves of my childhood, I find myself warmly grateful to this city for being a place where I can send my roots down deep, grateful that I have at last found my home.” (Veronica Mitchell, Toddled Dredge • 2008 11 18)
The Obama Dilemma: “Which of these factions in evangelicalism’s divided house is more reflective of its essential character? In truth, both have a strong claim. Evangelicalism has always been centrally concerned with social reform as the necessary expression of spiritual regeneration. It is not merely a religion of inwardness. Nor is it a religion devoted to maintaining the status quo and propping up social elites. Instead, it challenges settled arrangements and champions the lowly and the marginalized.” (Senior Fellow Wilfred M. McClay, The Wall Street Journal • 2008 11 01)
• Stephen Fry in America (2008 10 10)
• Give Me Liberty and Give Me Death (2008 09 30)
• Give Me That Old-Time Religion (2008 09 29)
• The Real Digital Revolution (2008 08 27)
• Après Lewis (2008 08 15)
Building a Healthy Culture: Strategies for an American Renaissance by Don Eberly, ed..
Essays by well-known thinkers argue for the importance of cultural health in maintaining a free and civil society and explore the theme of cultural renewal in many different sectors of life — family life, vocations, the media, and more.