Warning: This commentary contains spoilers for the latest film.
After nineteen years of absence from movie screens around the world, the re-appearance of Indiana Jones in a new movie, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull was accompanied by security precautions worthy of a new Pentagon weapons project. Movie extras were required to sign a non-disclosure agreement about the content of the movie, and one actor was allowed just a few hours to read the script in London prior to contract-signing before a courier flew it back to Los Angeles to re-deposit it in a safe. In Los Angeles, in a police sting operation, a man was arrested for trying to sell production photographs that he had allegedly stolen from the offices of producer George Lucas.
The global appetite for these movies has proved insatiable since the first in the series, Raiders of the Lost Ark, appeared in 1981. Much of the appeal of the series must go to actor Harrison Ford, who portrays the archeologist and adventurer Indiana Jones with a winning combination of traits: arrogance, cynicism, manly decisiveness, and not infrequent klutziness. Each of the movies, directed by Steven Spielberg and produced by George Lucas, has been fast-moving and colorful with highly imaginative plot devices. Together they have grossed more than a billion dollars. Spielberg and Lucas must be doing something right.
What the series have demonstrated above all, however, is that the movie-going public has an enduring appetite for portrayals of the supernatural. Producer Lucas has made it clear that he recognizes this. “Indiana Jones movies,” he has said in interviews, “aren’t action movies. They’re primarily mysteries with a supernatural object. It’s kind of like the X-Files.” He adds, “It’s important for us that there’s a real supernatural mystery going on. . . . They’re always going after some supernatural object. It’s not something that we made up. It’s something that actually exists, or people believe exists—whether it does or not is in dispute.”
Lucas himself appears to believe in the supernatural, if filtered through a generic New Age lens rather than the prism of any conventional religion. He told the PBS interviewer Bill Moyers, “There are mysteries and powers larger than we are and you have to trust your feelings in order to access them.” His directing colleague Steven Spielberg has told people that he believes in UFOs. Between them, both men have created a modern supernatural mythology through such movies as those in the Star Wars series, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, and E.T. The question is, how does this new mythology address age-old questions traditionally answered by religion?
Star Wars introduced the concept of “the Force,” a sort of vague New Age supernatural power whose only moral distinctives were “the Force” itself—presumed to be beneficent or at least neutral—and “the dark side,” presumed to be malevolent. The lost alien in E.T., befriended by an earthly child, turns out to be well disposed to the human race, which, inevitably, is insufficiently advanced to grasp this.
But the Indiana Jones adventures deal squarely with age-old concepts of the supernatural in human history: the biblical Ark of the Covenant in Raiders of the Lost Ark, Hindu sacred stones in The Temple of Doom, and the Holy Grail in The Last Crusade. The Kingdom of the Crystal Skull features a tie-in between ancient pre-Columbian religious beliefs and superhuman powers supposedly possessed by aliens who landed in the U.S. in the super-secret “Area 51” of New Mexico.
The dramatic tension of all the Indiana Jones movies is the battle between Jones and his cohorts and the machinations of truly evil humans who believe in the allegedly supernatural powers and wish to use them for their own wicked purposes. In Raiders, it is the Nazis, who, despite their contempt for the Jews, believe they can use the powers of the Ark, an artifact from the Hebrew Scriptures, for their own purposes. In The Temple of Doom, a deranged Hindu mystic wants to control the world through the possession of five magic-possessing stones. In The Last Crusade, the Nazis are back in the limelight, apparently understanding that control of the Holy Grail will grant them eternal life. In Crystal Skull, the supernatural powers are mind-control techniques sought by the Soviets in their Cold War rivalry with the U.S. and—inevitably—linked both to knowledge of aliens supposedly held by pre-Columbian Indians and to the actual aliens supposedly investigated by the American government at Area 51.
As in all the Indiana Jones movies, there is a mix of the real and the imagined in the supernatural themes. It was true, as Crystal Skull asserts, that Stalin and his successors toyed with the paranormal as a means to attain superior weaponry vis-à-vis the U.S. I once had a fascinating conversation with a former Soviet soldier who had been trained in a special military unit that employed paranormal techniques to improve the soldiers’ aim of weapons systems. (It was in New York and the ex-soldier was thankfully employing his special talents to drive a late-night cab. But he said that it worked.) But where truth and fantasy dance a tango is in the Spielberg-Lucas conflation of pre-Columbian myths and the super-advanced intelligence of aliens supposedly first encountered by the U.S. government back in the 1940s in New Mexico. The Area 51 and Roswell stories die hard, which is certainly convenient to imaginative moviemakers.
Despite Lucas’s New Age leanings, however, he firmly sides with traditionalists in the view that ancient religious artifacts of traditional religions contain real powers that should not be tampered with by human beings. The pro-Nazi archeologist in Raiders is destroyed when he looks at the Ark in its full display of power; Indiana Jones escapes death by keeping his eyes shut. The Nazi archeologist in Last Crusade falls to her death by grasping for the Holy Grail as the cup tumbles out of her reach. By analogy, Indiana Jones escapes death by letting the cup fall from his hands. In Crystal Skull, the Soviet scientist/agent Irina Spalko meets her death by demanding from the aliens ultimate knowledge. It proves to be a force so powerful that she is literally consumed by fire and dies. Her ally against Jones, the British traitor Mac, gets sucked into a different dimension in his greed for pre-Columbian wealth.
In effect, though Lucas-Spielberg have created a new mythology of supernatural power—the Star Wars–Close Encounters–E.T. mythology—they seem unwilling to dispense altogether with older belief systems and supernatural contrivances. This seems to irritate deeply some ultra-rationalist critics of their enterprise. The website of an organization called “The Center for Skeptical Enquiry” attacks the two Hollywood moguls for having “created a legacy of films that attack reason, sell transcendental fantasies, and undermine appreciation for science and progress.”
It’s an unconsciously ironic charge; The Golden Compass, the trilogy by Philip Pullman that has been turned into a somewhat successful movie, is a deliberate attack on Christianity, yet it is filled with “transcendental fantasies.” The ultra-rationalists cannot have it both ways; either Christianity and Judaism have real, supernatural truth-content, or their use of fantasy techniques quite parallel to the Indiana Jones series are equally invalid by their own criteria.
The global movie-going public, however, is not so puritanical about reason and the imagination. Just as the Indiana Jones movies convey a fascination with the most powerful ancient myths—or, if you prefer, beliefs—of all history, so they leave open the option that those beliefs might, just might, be true. In this case, Indiana Jones serves up escapism, fantasy, and imagination. But he may also serve up more truth than his creators realize.
Dr. Aikman, a Senior Fellow of the Trinity Forum, was for many years senior correspondent for Time.
Columns, David Aikman, Arts and Culture, Faiths and Worldviews, Thu 19 Jun 2008
For many, the evil in the world overshadows the good, obscures it, and even causes its denial. But it is the fact of joy that is the real mystery of our being.
James V. Schall, S.J., On the Unseriousness of Human Affairs, xiv
Redefining Democracy, Ethics, and Evangelicalism
A European Challenge to Anti-Americanism
Religion, Politics, and Public Opinion
Lives of Adventure, Fulfillment, and Service
The X-Files and the Enlightenment Myth
The Rise of Global Civil Society: Building Communities and Nations from the Bottom Up by Don Eberly.
A sweeping and hopeful overview of the extraordinary new forces that are prying open closed societies and cultivating democratic norms across the globe.
The Real Digital Revolution: Social networking is changing the marketing landscape: “Brand advertising can’t stretch the truth anymore or try and gild the lily. Because if it does, we’re going to find out about it, find out that you’ve been lying to us all along about extras that don’t work and specials that aren’t special. And our reaction is not going to be pretty.” (Alan Wolk, AdWeek; h/t: Ryan Moede • 2008 08 27)
Après Lewis: ‘As it turns out, Tim Keller’s “The Reason for God” (2008), the book recommended by my friend, is the best of the “Mere Christianity” wannabes. Mr. Keller argues that the usual objections to Christianity—that it is a straitjacket, that there cannot be just one true religion—are themselves the product of a particular (secular Western) point of view. He then builds an affirmative case for Christianity, suggesting that the Big Bang and our appreciation of beauty are clues pointing to God and that Christ’s resurrection was so unlikely both to Greeks and Romans (who viewed the material world as weak and corrupt) and to Jews (who expected any resurrection to come at the end of time) that it cannot be dismissed as the clever marketing strategy of a new religion. If this sounds a little like N.T. Wright, it isn’t accidental: Mr. Keller draws liberally from him, as well as Lewis, Christian philosopher Alvin Plantinga (a professor at Notre Dame) and others. “The Reason for God” is as sensible and winsome as one would expect from the pastor of a latticework of churches that draw more than 5,000 attendees in New York City every Sunday, most of them young, single, urban professionals. But it too is no “Mere Christianity.” It does not have the original arguments or the magical prose of Lewis’s classic.’ (David Skeel, Wall Street Journal • 2008 08 15)
Alexander Solzhenitsyn: the line within: ‘Solzhenitsyn was far from endorsing the thesis of the “banality of evil” as Hannah Arendt had expounded it. Nor did he see totalitarianism as the ultimate source of the evil that it promotes. Rather totalitarian government is the great mistake, made for whatever noble or ignoble purpose, of putting the final goal before the present dilemma. It is this which gives evil intentions the same chance as good ones, which enables the criminal and the psychopath to compete on a level with the saint and the hero. Yet even in totalitarianism the evil belongs to the human beings, and not to the system. This is the remarkable message that Solzhenitsyn, crawling from the death-machine, carried pressed to his heart.’ (Senior Fellow Roger Scruton, in openDemocracy • 2008 08 11)
Atheism and Evil: Could it possibly improve things to believe that the long pain of human evolution was set in motion by chance alone? The atheist view of the world is actually rather bleaker than that of Jews and Christians: Suffering under the weight of evil is meaningless, and so is any struggle against evil. Everything in the atheist’s world begins and ends in randomness and chance. Few atheists seem to be as rigorously honest as Friedrich Nietzsche, who warned that if God is dead, it is wishful thinking to hold that reason alone can confer “meaning” on life. Reason has been outmoded by chance. (Michael Novak, First Things: On the Square • 2008 07 29)
• Christopher Nolan’s Achievement: The Dark Knight (2008 07 22)
• Unplanned Parenthood (2008 07 21)
• What makes a supervillain? (2008 07 19)
• Pope’s Speech at Barangaroo (2008 07 17)
• Hollywood’s Hero Deficit (2008 07 17)