Irony

Peter Edman

A quick comment here on a situation of high irony. I’ve been tangentially aware of a debate going on between Kevin Kelly and John Updike.

I have sympathies with both sides of this argument on print versus pixels, but I find it seriously ironic that now that we have reached a point where technology via the Web permits us to say what needs to be said regardless of length and without concerns for the costs of printing and distribution, we must access it via technologies that most people seem to find uncomfortable for extended reading.

In the case of our website, I’ve tried to pick colors that are easy on the eye, and I have also created a stylesheet that should allow you to print out any of our articles to your own printer at a convenient type size. Try it out. 

1 Responses (comments are closed) • Gleanings, Science and Technology, Mon 19 Jun 2006

Comments and Responses
By al mcdonald
on 2006 06 20

Look forward to our discission.....am as much interested in the comments of other fellws as in the original piece.....

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

We take, and must continue to take, morally hazardous actions to preserve our civilization. We must exercise our power. But we ought neither to believe that a nation is capable of perfect disinterestedness in its exercise, nor become complacent about particular degrees of interest and passion which corrupt the justice whereby the exercise of power is legitimatized.

Reinhold Niebuhr

Responses on this Article

al mcdonald: Look forward to our discission.....am as much interested in the comments of other fellws as in the original piece.....

Site Services

Search:

Advanced Search

Member Login

Join the Site

Forgotten your password?

Send this Article to a Friend

Print this Article

Print without Comments

Recent Articles

Lebanon on the Brink

A Cultural Manifesto and Showcase

Steep Trajectory

McClay at the White House

Johnston on Speaking of Faith

China, Tibet, and the Olympics

A Tale of Temptation for Our Times

A Brief Chat with Screwtape

Christ for Culture

Obama’s ‘Bitter’ Comments

Featured Resource

Cover image via AmazonOrthodoxy: The Romance of Faith by G. K. Chesterton.

On its 100th anniversary, this book is just as helpful and provocative as ever.

Gleanings Quick Links

Orthodoxy: Georgetown’s Father Schall reviews G. K. Chesterton’s Orthodoxy on its 100 year anniversary. “In coming to believe in Christianity, Chesterton, as he tells us, did not read a single Christian book in the process. Rather, he read book after book of those who maintained that Christianity could not possibly be true. After he had read many of these tractates, he suddenly realized that the intellectual opponents of Christianity were constantly contradicting themselves about what they were opposing. Chesterton, the most logical of men, figured that anything so odd as to be opposed for the exact opposite reasons must either be quite strange or, in fact, rather normal and true.” A helpful introduction to a lovely book. (James V. Schall, SJ, InsideCatholic.com , 2008 05 05)

Where Were Obama’s Friends?: Friendship under fire: “As for the supersized candidates, what strikes one most about them is their ‘aloneness.’ They look so solitary. Indeed, it is possible that the old and honorable notion of ‘standing with’ a candidate like Obama simply didn’t occur to his famous supporters this week. Everyone has become used to watching celebrity stars and athletes take it in the neck on their own. Even someone running for the nation’s presidency looks like just another personal crack-up.” Makes one pause.  (Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal , 2008 05 01)

There’s no way you’re going to convince me: Catholic professor Scott Carson covers the current debates on evil between N T Wright and Bart Ehrman on Beliefnet: “[H]aving had a look at this most recent exchange I have to say that it continues to astound me how simplistic and thoughtless the popular treatment of the problem has become. . . . It’s as if generations of sophisticated and complex theological and philosophical argument amount to nothing when compared to the emotional attitudes of a single individual living in a highly particularized time and place. . . . Just as atheists and agnostics are often—perhaps way too often—tempted to assume that believers only believe for emotional or psychological reasons, so too, it seems rather obvious to me, every non-believer almost certainly has emotional and psychological reasons for not believing that will trump any and every legitimate argument posed against them.” (extensive links from the article to the primary sources) (An Examined Life , 2008 04 27)

The Way We Weren’t: “The fifties really were a time when the culture broadly affirmed Christianity as a Good Thing. I was there. I saw it; I heard it. And yet some kind of demurral is strongly indicated: some sign of recognition that no human society, whatever its good intentions and methods, has lived unburdened, unencumbered by the crushing weight of human fallenness. Good as life may appear to have been in the cities and universities of France and Italy in the thirteenth century, or amid the sweaty fervor of the camp meetings in nineteenth-century America, or among the fierce faith of the emancipators, always human pride and general nuttiness were there to spoil the broth.” (William Murchison, in Touchstone , 2008 04 23)

Not on Sale (2008 04 14)
Seven New Deadly Sins, Suitably Updated (2008 04 10)
The Pope Comes to America (2008 04 09)
Both Read the Same Bible (2008 04 09)
Muslims Outnumber World’s Catholics (2008 03 31)

more . . .