Joseph Loconte
Last week a diverse group of political, business, military, academic, and religious leaders released a report, Changing Course: A New Direction for U.S. Relations With the Muslim World. Convened by the Search for Common Ground and the Consensus Building Institute, the group issued several recommendations, including the promotion of economic growth and good governance in Muslim states.
They summarized their work thus:
The central message of our strategy is that the U.S. government, business, faith, education, and media leaders must work with Muslim counterparts to build a coalition that will turn the tide against extremism. Our recommendations are directed primarily to U.S. leaders and institutions, but we can succeed only if counterparts in Muslim majority countries and communities also take responsibility for addressing key challenges: reducing extremism, resolving political and sectarian conflicts, holding governments accountable, creating more vibrant economies, correcting misconceptions, and engaging in dialogue to build mutual respect and understanding.
The report deserves careful scrutiny. In the works for nearly two years, it focuses attention on the “soft power” dimension to U.S. foreign policy, which could benefit from some fresh thinking. However, the 34-member group was chaired by former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who mostly ignored the importance of religion to U.S. foreign policy during her tenure in the Clinton administration. The report’s guiding assumptions remain fuzzy, especially when it comes to identifying the core issues dividing many Americans from Muslims around the world. Thus we read the following claim: “Policies and actions—not a clash of civilizations—are at the root of our divisions.”
Whatever the factors fueling divisions between Americans and Muslims in the Middle East and elsewhere, religious ideology—embedded in cultural institutions—surely plays a significant role. Likewise, the report’s executive summary makes no mention of a massive problem in the Islamic world: the relative lack of genuine religious liberty. A report on American-Muslim relations that tries to elide these issues suggests not a sober appraisal of unpleasant facts on the ground, but rather another flirtation with political correctness.
Fodder, Faiths and Worldviews, Religious Liberty, War and Peace, Joseph Loconte, Tue 30 Sep 2008
The best thing you can do for your fellow, next to rousing his conscience, is—not to give him things to think about, but to wake things up that are in him; or say, to make him think things for himself.
George MacDonald
The Oracle of the Dog by G. K. Chesterton, foreword by P. Douglas Wilson.
A Father Brown mystery story that addresses themes of character, listening, and false assumptions.
The Institutionalization of Greed
John Piper explains Why Calvinists are so Negative: This, with the item below from Frederica, offer two timely perspectives on appropriate humility—which could also be approached with profit from the perspective of strategy. “I must tell you that whenever I have had a profound experience of God through reading his word or encountering God in worship or community, it tends to just humble me, and make me want to say something like what Joni Mitchell said about love—‘it’s love’s illusions I recall; I really don’t know love, at all.’ I have barely touched the hem of the Master’s garment, I hardly know him though I long to know him better. In the face of the divine-human encounter, even Barth’s Dogmatics appear to be little more than a good start to understanding God.” (New Testament scholar Ben Witherington III • 2008 11 19)
Confessions of an Obnoxious Orthodox: Salutary. “Most people like to be polite and get along, so they highlight our commonalities. But every church must have its distinctiveness, or we’d all be in the same church. At the time, I was so occupied with comprehending this strange thing called Orthodoxy that I emphasized the differences, and was impatient with kindly big-tent suggestions.” (Frederica Mathewes-Green, Beliefnet • 2008 11 19)
Finding Home: A worthwhile meditation on place: “My parents have moved a lot in their lives, and view towns and cities as places to go for opportunities, not places to live for love of the place itself. They still pressure us occasionally to move closer to them. Maybe someday we will; as I said above, I know I would find things to love wherever we lived. But after all the moves of my childhood, I find myself warmly grateful to this city for being a place where I can send my roots down deep, grateful that I have at last found my home.” (Veronica Mitchell, Toddled Dredge • 2008 11 18)
The Obama Dilemma: “Which of these factions in evangelicalism’s divided house is more reflective of its essential character? In truth, both have a strong claim. Evangelicalism has always been centrally concerned with social reform as the necessary expression of spiritual regeneration. It is not merely a religion of inwardness. Nor is it a religion devoted to maintaining the status quo and propping up social elites. Instead, it challenges settled arrangements and champions the lowly and the marginalized.” (Senior Fellow Wilfred M. McClay, The Wall Street Journal • 2008 11 01)
• Stephen Fry in America (2008 10 10)
• Give Me Liberty and Give Me Death (2008 09 30)
• Give Me That Old-Time Religion (2008 09 29)
• The Real Digital Revolution (2008 08 27)
• Après Lewis (2008 08 15)
God at Work: The History and Promise of the Faith at Work Movement by David W. Miller.
Done well, the integration of faith and work has positive implications at the personal level, as well as for corporate ethics and the broader economic sphere.