Al Sikes
Perhaps, just perhaps, reality has caught up with political speechwriters. The texture of current events, the velocity of their mutations, and the uncertainty of responses all point toward an authentic “crossroads” moment. All those public figures, whose political speeches have put them at the helm during an especially crucial moment in history, may now get their wish.
Yet, as each day passes it is clear that conditions are in control. We (and it is a virtually universal we) have reached a real “moment of truth.” The culture has overwhelmed its purported masters; the culmination of systemic wrong-headedness has miniaturized much of the leader class.
The President attempts to calm the nation; markets mock his words. The Treasury Secretary and former head of Goldman Sachs (said to be the most successful investment bank in the world) searches publicly and painfully for answers. And history (although quite recent) now suggests that the revered Alan Greenspan ill-served the nation’s monetary policy coming out of the last boom-and-bust cycle.
I am inclined to believe we are at that moment when the warnings of philosophers and theologians are proving prescient. Philosophically, biblically we have been warned about self-gratification and the inexorability of unrestrained human desires and resulting excess. We have been awash in both. The palpability of personal and collective debt, for example, precludes the need to cite the data.
If the underlying corruption of public and private finance were not so serious, it would be laughable. Today we talk about housing defaults because it is the crisis du jour. When are we going to seriously talk about under-funded pension and health-care programs? And when it comes to day-to-day government operating expenses at the Federal level, we merrily pass debt on to future generations while at the state level we get more and more of our revenue from state-owned or state-sponsored gambling. And as events reveal, Wall Street, aided by the federal government, has been sponsoring an especially toxic form of gambling.
The more pessimistic (or perhaps prescient) philosophers through the ages have predicted that the human condition would undermine government by the governed. We should all be eternally grateful that the U.S. founders understood both cerebrally and spiritually the need for a rigorous system of checks and balances.
So where are we at this moment? Are we in a serious financial crisis that will over time prove seminal? Or are we experiencing a predictive moment in an inexorable decline? Economists forecast that we are in for a deep recession. If they are correct, perhaps this will be an instructive event that will reacquaint us with transcendent truths.
The American founders believed that the people’s faith in God, and the implications of that faithfulness, would underpin a government by the governed that had a mission of assuring “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” They knew the overwhelming importance of the nation’s character, which is upstream of business and political decision-making. Notwithstanding, the foundations of faith are unceasingly attacked in the precincts of secular power.
Today’s crisis is said to be about money (too little liquidity); I believe it is about character. Putting people at profound risk as a tool of either public or private greed is morally wrong. Sure, each time a loan is made to an aspiring homeowner or entrepreneur, for example, there is risk, but the risk of highly leveraged purchases of exotic securities is of a different order. And the risk of under-funding pension and health-care promises (yes—promises, not mere programs) is of a different and, I would suggest, more profound order.
In a Darwinian world such conduct is simply in the order of things. After all, there are thousands who now live in lavish comfort as a result of their predation. They are survivors. But those who deal derisively or dismissively with faith and its foundations should pause; this crisis offers a learning moment.
We are on the eve of an election. It is often said that this election will be the most important one in at least a generation. Perhaps. I have no trouble finding admirable traits in both candidates for President, and I am hopeful because that is my temperament. But in parallel, I am convinced that the most important need is not on Pennsylvania Avenue but in the hearts and minds of the governed.
Perhaps both candidates (contemplating their bully pulpit) should spend a few minutes with Václav Havel’s essay, Politics, Morality and Civility. Havel begins: “As ridiculous or Quixotic as it may sound these days, one thing seems certain to me: that it is my responsibility to emphasize, again and again, the moral origin of all genuine politics, to stress the significance of moral values and standards in all spheres of social life, including economics, and to explain that if we don’t try, within ourselves, to discover or rediscover or cultivate what I call ‘higher responsibility,’ things will turn out very badly indeed for our country.”
Al Sikes is Chairman of The Trinity Forum.
Features, Business, Character and Ethics, Society, Tue 14 Oct 2008
Joy is the simplest form of gratitude.
Karl Barth
The New Shape of World Christianity: How American Experience Reflects Global Faith by Mark A. Noll.
With characteristic rigor and insight, Mark Noll revisits the history of the American church in the context of world events.
Embracing Our Creative Limitations
Guroian and Guptara on Speaking of Faith
The Case for Working With Your Hands: “There probably aren’t many jobs that can be reduced to rule-following and still be done well. But in many jobs there is an attempt to do just this, and the perversity of it may go unnoticed by those who design the work process.” (Matthew Crawford, The New York Times • 2009 06 04)
Wanda Sykes, Al Franken and the Politics of Incivility: “So civility has an unavoidably moral component. The proper treatment of others conveys regard and demonstrates self-control. Rudeness sets out to dominate and humiliate. . . . Why does politics seem to numb this rudimentary moral sense?” (Michael Gerson, The Washington Post • 2009 05 15)
The Threat of Culture: Senior Fellow William Edgar: “Does the perversion of culture mean that the problem is culture itself? Although there are Christians who defend such a view, it is far off the mark…. It is never enough simply to decry the evils of the world, and then to offer salvation either as a way of warring against culture or as an escape from the world. In his Mars Hill speech, Paul reminds his listeners of the original purpose of history. God is the maker of the world and everything in it. He is to be worshiped as such.” (Gospel & Culture Project • 2009 03 25)
The New Humanism: Senior Fellow Roger Scruton: “The new humanism spends little time exalting man as an ideal. It says nothing, or next to nothing, about faith, hope, and charity; is scathing about patriotism; and is dismissive of those rearguard actions in defense of the family, public spirit, and sexual restraint that animated my parents. Instead of idealizing man, the new humanism denigrates God and attacks the belief in God as a human weakness. My parents too thought belief in God to be a weakness. But they were reluctant to deprive other human beings of a moral prop that they seemed to need.” (The American Spectator • 2009 03 25)
• Knowing and finding (2009 03 20)
• Obama’s Prayer Warriors (2009 03 18)
• How Science Fiction Found Religion (2009 03 11)
• Science and the Obama Administration (2009 03 05)
• The Triumph of Banality (2009 03 04)
The Lost Tools of Learning by Dorothy L. Sayers, Foreword by Dan Russ.
“The person who is denied or declines the opportunity to be a student of life is destined to a diminished existence,” says Dan Russ in the Foreword to this interesting Reading.