Al Sikes
As I work though these thoughts, glances out the window reveal little but fog. On this Wednesday, the day after the Potomac primaries, the Chesapeake Bay is fog-bound.
One of The Trinity Forum’s essential explorations is to find flickers of light in a fog-bound world. We look for glimpses of God that reveal transcendence at work.
Occasionally we find those moments in public leadership. Washington and Lincoln and Wilberforce—exemplars all—drew on otherworldly forces to transcend earthly limitations. Each found divine power on their knees.
Washington and Lincoln found themselves leading at crucial moments; moments which evoked a level of humility few leaders ever truly experience. Humility, then strength, and finally a transcendent force, caused the earth to shudder.
Political campaigns are not usually momentous moments. We select a President every four years and most candidates behave in less than inspiring ways. The campaigns themselves often tell us more about the voters than the candidates. Only service in the Oval Office eventually betrays the real strengths and weaknesses of those elected. If we voters were more prescient, our list of great presidents would not be so short.
At the risk of seeming an innocent at an advanced age, I think the voters are reflecting a flicker of light on themselves. By now we have endured months of political maneuvering, intrigue and, in the last month, winnowing. As the wind begins to clear away the fog, the voters seem in an especially elevated mood.
On one side the voters are poised to select a national hero whose transcendent moments (and earthly ones as well) are well documented. They have been told endlessly and loudly that he does not fit his chosen party’s political orthodoxy. His delegate count, however, continues to grow and virtually everybody now concedes he will be nominated. The voters seem to be saying that, notwithstanding his heterodoxy, he is worthy of belief.
About his likely opponent those in the know had said “no way.” “He,” they said, “lacks experience and is wrong demographically.” Yet there he was last night speaking to a rapt crowd of prospective voters at the University of Wisconsin, going beyond political policies to talk across all demographic groups about being “my brother’s keeper, . . . my sister’s keeper,” and urging parents to turn off the TV and video games so their children can struggle, because without struggle success is elusive.
Culture-shaping is upstream of politics and sociologists and historians are often humbled by their own meanderings as they opine on what forces shape the culture. Being neither, I am fearless.
Recent decades have revealed a Darwinian individualism, a strain nowhere more pronounced than in politics. A “survival of the fittest” mentality has been pushed by political handlers and operatives and too often embraced, or at least accepted, by would-be leaders. Perhaps politics has been informed by similar patterns in the mass arts, many businesses, and even in what are said to be religious pursuits.
Perhaps, just perhaps, we are seeing the emergence of a countervailing force. Perhaps, just reaching a tipping point, is a force that is saying, in the words of Howard Beale, the anchor in the movie Network, “I’m as mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!” Maybe, just maybe, as product and political cycles have shortened and as consumers and voters have been treated ever less respectfully, an emerging force is beginning to push back—a force defined less by the material and more by the spiritual.
Certainly the presidential campaign will feature sharp differences and there will be uncivil moments. But by my measure the campaigns to date have had to measure up to the standards of the voters, and those seem increasingly to reject the Darwinian approach.
Fog is an interesting phenomenon; it obscures and then it is gone. Political fog is abrupt neither in its arrival nor its departure. And certainly, significant cultural shifts are exceedingly difficult to sense in the early days of emerging change. Almost nine long months remain in this quadrennial contest; I hope that as it unfolds encouraging patterns can be discerned, and not just by the winning side.
Al Sikes is Chairman of The Trinity Forum.
4 Responses (comments are closed) • Provocations, Leadership, Society, Wed 13 Feb 2008
If that candle burns, its flicker is faint and far removed from my sight.
I think people are relying on the right leader to solve all the problems (think of Israel circa 0 AD). The problem is not with the leader of a nation, it is with the colective selves of a nation.
History is the scene of the working out of God’s justice, which we can never escape, but it is also the scene of the revelation of the everlasting mercy. Lincoln knew that, if we stress only the mercy, we become sentimentalists, while, if we stress only the justice, we are driven to despair. The secret of rationality is the maintenance of the tension. The greatest possible mistake is the fatuous supposition that we have resolved it.
Elton Trueblood, Abraham Lincoln: Theologian of American Anguish
Dr. Robert Kachadourian: This was an interesting commentary and evoked my thoughts which may or may not be long remembered. However,…
Dave: If that candle burns, its flicker is faint and far removed from my sight. I think people are…
A Cultural Manifesto and Showcase
China, Tibet, and the Olympics
A Spiritual Pilgrimage by Malcolm Muggeridge, Foreword by Alonzo L. McDonald.
A life in perspective, offering questions to consider and a path worth exploring.
Orthodoxy: Georgetown’s Father Schall reviews G. K. Chesterton’s Orthodoxy on its 100 year anniversary. “In coming to believe in Christianity, Chesterton, as he tells us, did not read a single Christian book in the process. Rather, he read book after book of those who maintained that Christianity could not possibly be true. After he had read many of these tractates, he suddenly realized that the intellectual opponents of Christianity were constantly contradicting themselves about what they were opposing. Chesterton, the most logical of men, figured that anything so odd as to be opposed for the exact opposite reasons must either be quite strange or, in fact, rather normal and true.” A helpful introduction to a lovely book. (James V. Schall, SJ, InsideCatholic.com , 2008 05 05)
Where Were Obama’s Friends?: Friendship under fire: “As for the supersized candidates, what strikes one most about them is their ‘aloneness.’ They look so solitary. Indeed, it is possible that the old and honorable notion of ‘standing with’ a candidate like Obama simply didn’t occur to his famous supporters this week. Everyone has become used to watching celebrity stars and athletes take it in the neck on their own. Even someone running for the nation’s presidency looks like just another personal crack-up.” Makes one pause. (Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal , 2008 05 01)
There’s no way you’re going to convince me: Catholic professor Scott Carson covers the current debates on evil between N T Wright and Bart Ehrman on Beliefnet: “[H]aving had a look at this most recent exchange I have to say that it continues to astound me how simplistic and thoughtless the popular treatment of the problem has become. . . . It’s as if generations of sophisticated and complex theological and philosophical argument amount to nothing when compared to the emotional attitudes of a single individual living in a highly particularized time and place. . . . Just as atheists and agnostics are often—perhaps way too often—tempted to assume that believers only believe for emotional or psychological reasons, so too, it seems rather obvious to me, every non-believer almost certainly has emotional and psychological reasons for not believing that will trump any and every legitimate argument posed against them.” (extensive links from the article to the primary sources) (An Examined Life , 2008 04 27)
The Way We Weren’t: “The fifties really were a time when the culture broadly affirmed Christianity as a Good Thing. I was there. I saw it; I heard it. And yet some kind of demurral is strongly indicated: some sign of recognition that no human society, whatever its good intentions and methods, has lived unburdened, unencumbered by the crushing weight of human fallenness. Good as life may appear to have been in the cities and universities of France and Italy in the thirteenth century, or amid the sweaty fervor of the camp meetings in nineteenth-century America, or among the fierce faith of the emancipators, always human pride and general nuttiness were there to spoil the broth.” (William Murchison, in Touchstone , 2008 04 23)
• Not on Sale (2008 04 14)
• Seven New Deadly Sins, Suitably Updated (2008 04 10)
• The Pope Comes to America (2008 04 09)
• Both Read the Same Bible (2008 04 09)
• Muslims Outnumber World’s Catholics (2008 03 31)
US
on 2008 02 15
This was an interesting commentary and evoked my thoughts which may or may not be long remembered.
However, the fact is, perhaps insurmountable reality, that special interests and real-politique will always trump what is best for our nation.
Someone, somewhere and somehow this cycle of the public being in a dilemma of seeking national leadership must stop.
Perhaps in the next nine months or so we will get the answer that is the correct one.
Robert Kachadourian, Ph.D.