C. William Pollard
David W. Miller, God at Work: The History and Promise of the Faith at Work Movement, Oxford University Press, November 2006, Hardcover, 232 pages, ISBN 0195314808.
In our diverse and pluralistic society, is there room for God at work? Are there not some lessons from history or societal norms that provide good reason for separating the sacred from the secular? What is there in common between the labor of my work, the profit I seek in my business, and the God I worship on Sunday?
In his recent book, God at Work, David Miller, executive director of the Center for Faith and Culture at Yale, responds to these questions and more as he provides an extensive review of the development and history of the faith-at-work movement and discusses the implication of its growing acceptance and potential value for the way we do business and the way we live and relate to each other.
Much of the research for this book was done by Miller for his Ph.D. dissertation at Princeton Seminary. Prior to his seminary training, he served in executive positions in international business and finance. The breadth of his experience in business, his training and understanding of theology and the role of a minister, and his current leadership position at Yale has uniquely prepared him to assess the past, present, and future of the faith-at-work movement.
Recent articles in such publications as Fortune, Business Week, and the Wall Street Journal confirm that there is an increasing number of people who want to integrate the claims of their faith with the demands of their work. They are seeking to find meaning and purpose for their time at work and are no longer willing to bifurcate their lives and experience in what is sometimes referred to as that Sunday/Monday gap.
While a growing number of people are now participating in Bible studies at work, attending management seminars on the role of spirituality at work, and seeking training in how to relate biblical teaching with marketplace demands, Miller’s research indicates that for the most part, the church has been silent and non-responsive. To help fill this void of silence, there has developed a rapidly growing number of “parachurch” organizations, some led by business people and others led by those who have theological training. Corporate chaplaincy programs are also on the rise and it is estimated that there are now over 2,000 workplace chaplains nationwide.
Why has the church and its leadership been so silent? Miller’s response to this question suggests that patterns of thought from the past continue to discourage a meaningful engagement by the clergy with the laity in a workaday world ministry. Miller also finds that many of the teaching faculty at seminaries and other institutions offering biblical studies continue to have presuppositions about capitalism, business, and the marketplace that range from benign to negative. On the negative side, the views portray the business community as a necessary evil, unsupportive of social justice concerns, harmful and exploitive of people, an environment that is only interested in maximizing profits.
He also notes, however, that some of the more evangelically oriented seminaries, such as Gordon-Conwell and Fuller, have developed centers to focus on the faith at work movement and to serve as a bridge between the church and the world of business. Also Regent College in Vancouver, Canada has developed a particular focus for educating and equipping lay business people to see their work as a ministry.
In his review of the history of the movement, he recognizes that the concept of faith at work is not new and has its roots in the historical development of biblical teaching on this subject in both the Old and New Testament. He also describes in some detail what he calls the various “waves” of the movement, starting in the late nineteenth century and continuing to today. As one reads this historical account, it is clear that over the years, the leadership and energy for making things happen have come from the laity.
While Miller’s book focuses primarily on the Christian dimensions of the faith/work movement in the United States, he also recognizes that it has an international dimension and has a diversity among its participants that includes initiatives from other religious faiths, such as Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and those described as having a “New Age” philosophy of life.
As part of seeking some common understanding of the faith/work movement among different faiths and among the laity and the clergy of the same faith, Miller suggests a conceptual framework that involves four separate spheres or areas of interest for considering why people seek to integrate their faith with their work. He identifies these four spheres as Ethics, Evangelism, Experience, and Enrichment. While this analysis may be helpful to understanding the motivation and objectives of people seeking to integrate their faith with their work, it may also have the potential to be divisive as one seeks to fit people into categories or labels.
For the Christian, I believe that the integration of faith and work will always involve a tension between the truth of God’s Way and the inclusiveness of his love. The vocation of business can be a calling from God. The management of people is truly a liberal art and profit is not just a result of sin, but is part of God’s economy of surplus and our responsibility of stewardship. Christians are called to be in the world, but not of it and to be excellent in what they do, whether they call it a job, profession, or ministry. When we seek to excel in whatever that may be—as a lawyer, business person, minister or educator, we can live and share our faith in a way that is engaging and cannot be ignored or contained. However, when we proclaim our faith and don’t live it, we sow seeds of cynicism and rejection. We should not leave God on the doorstep of any area of our life, including our work.
God at Work is a leading and authoritative source for those who want to study and know more about the faith-at-work movement. David Miller provides the reader with a stimulating and sometimes provocative review of its scope and potential. One would hope that leadership in the church and in the academy would consider and implement some of his suggestions for developing a greater understanding and involvement in supporting the laity in their ministry at work. In the process, they may learn more of the theology of God’s way and worship and their role in the pulpit on Sunday as they engage with those who are actively involved in integrating and implementing the truth and principles of the faith from Monday to Friday in a workaday world.
Bill Pollard is Chairman Emeritus of The ServiceMaster Company and author of the best-selling The Soul of the Firm and the recent Serving Two Masters? Reflections on God and Profit (HarperCollins 2006). He is a past Trustee and Chairman of the Board of The Trinity Forum.
I have long believed that the greatest sin the human mind can commit is to try to explain away the obvious.
Philip Hallie, Tales of Good and Evil, Help and Harm
Redefining Democracy, Ethics, and Evangelicalism
A European Challenge to Anti-Americanism
Religion, Politics, and Public Opinion
Lives of Adventure, Fulfillment, and Service
The X-Files and the Enlightenment Myth
The Delusion of Disbelief: Why the New Atheism is a Threat to Your Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness by David Aikman.
Aikman offers a reasoned response to four writers at the forefront of today’s anti-faith movement: Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Christopher Hitchens.
The Real Digital Revolution: Social networking is changing the marketing landscape: “Brand advertising can’t stretch the truth anymore or try and gild the lily. Because if it does, we’re going to find out about it, find out that you’ve been lying to us all along about extras that don’t work and specials that aren’t special. And our reaction is not going to be pretty.” (Alan Wolk, AdWeek; h/t: Ryan Moede • 2008 08 27)
Après Lewis: ‘As it turns out, Tim Keller’s “The Reason for God” (2008), the book recommended by my friend, is the best of the “Mere Christianity” wannabes. Mr. Keller argues that the usual objections to Christianity—that it is a straitjacket, that there cannot be just one true religion—are themselves the product of a particular (secular Western) point of view. He then builds an affirmative case for Christianity, suggesting that the Big Bang and our appreciation of beauty are clues pointing to God and that Christ’s resurrection was so unlikely both to Greeks and Romans (who viewed the material world as weak and corrupt) and to Jews (who expected any resurrection to come at the end of time) that it cannot be dismissed as the clever marketing strategy of a new religion. If this sounds a little like N.T. Wright, it isn’t accidental: Mr. Keller draws liberally from him, as well as Lewis, Christian philosopher Alvin Plantinga (a professor at Notre Dame) and others. “The Reason for God” is as sensible and winsome as one would expect from the pastor of a latticework of churches that draw more than 5,000 attendees in New York City every Sunday, most of them young, single, urban professionals. But it too is no “Mere Christianity.” It does not have the original arguments or the magical prose of Lewis’s classic.’ (David Skeel, Wall Street Journal • 2008 08 15)
Alexander Solzhenitsyn: the line within: ‘Solzhenitsyn was far from endorsing the thesis of the “banality of evil” as Hannah Arendt had expounded it. Nor did he see totalitarianism as the ultimate source of the evil that it promotes. Rather totalitarian government is the great mistake, made for whatever noble or ignoble purpose, of putting the final goal before the present dilemma. It is this which gives evil intentions the same chance as good ones, which enables the criminal and the psychopath to compete on a level with the saint and the hero. Yet even in totalitarianism the evil belongs to the human beings, and not to the system. This is the remarkable message that Solzhenitsyn, crawling from the death-machine, carried pressed to his heart.’ (Senior Fellow Roger Scruton, in openDemocracy • 2008 08 11)
Atheism and Evil: Could it possibly improve things to believe that the long pain of human evolution was set in motion by chance alone? The atheist view of the world is actually rather bleaker than that of Jews and Christians: Suffering under the weight of evil is meaningless, and so is any struggle against evil. Everything in the atheist’s world begins and ends in randomness and chance. Few atheists seem to be as rigorously honest as Friedrich Nietzsche, who warned that if God is dead, it is wishful thinking to hold that reason alone can confer “meaning” on life. Reason has been outmoded by chance. (Michael Novak, First Things: On the Square • 2008 07 29)
• Christopher Nolan’s Achievement: The Dark Knight (2008 07 22)
• Unplanned Parenthood (2008 07 21)
• What makes a supervillain? (2008 07 19)
• Pope’s Speech at Barangaroo (2008 07 17)
• Hollywood’s Hero Deficit (2008 07 17)
The Call: Finding and Fulfilling the Central Purpose of Your Life by Os Guinness.
A new paperback edition includes a workbook.