Who’s a Dogmatist?

Joseph Loconte

Joe Loconte

Earlier this week the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life released its second report on the U.S. Religious Landscape Survey. It suggests that although many Americans consider themselves highly religious, most are not “dogmatic” in their approach to faith—at least, they’re not dogmatic as some pollsters define dogmatism. According to the Pew survey, about 70 percent of Americans with a religious affiliation say that many religions—not just their own—can lead to eternal life. Most believe that the teachings of their own faith can be interpreted in various ways. Pew Forum director Luis Lugo summarized the results this way:

“The fact that most Americans are not exclusive or dogmatic about their religion is a fascinating finding. Most people will be surprised that a majority of adherents in nearly all religious traditions, including a majority of evangelical Protestants, say that there isn’t just one way to salvation or to interpret the teachings of their own faith.”

On the face of it, this is good news for those who don’t like the idea of religions that make uncomfortable truth claims—that is, statements about God and our obligations to him that apply to every person of every nation on the face of the earth. Some sociologists of American religion, such as Alan Wolfe, author of One Nation After All, have spent much of their careers trying to redefine American Christianity in the soothing terms of the Pew survey results.

What does this tell us about the character of American Christianity? No one can really say. The test of anyone’s “orthodoxy” is not what he or she tells a pollster. It is how we live when no one is looking: whether we act with integrity when dishonesty beckons; whether we show patience and empathy when righteous indignation seems justified; whether we share the “hard” teachings of Jesus with a friend whose judgment of us we value; whether we ever pray, with aching hearts, that those we love will come to know Christ’s forgiveness.

There are plenty of “dogmatists,” this writer included, whose Christian beliefs often have little influence on their everyday thoughts and choices. That’s a problem of the heart, of course, which pollsters aren’t equipped to measure.

Fodder, Faiths and Worldviews, Society, Wed 25 Jun 2008

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

What else is the philosophy of Christ, which he himself calls a rebirth, than the restoration of human nature originally well formed?

Erasmus of Rotterdam

Site Services

Search:

Advanced Search

Member Login

Join the Site

Forgotten your password?

Send this Article to a Friend

Print this Article

Print without Comments

Recent Articles

Redefining Democracy, Ethics, and Evangelicalism

A New Kind of Culture War

A European Challenge to Anti-Americanism

Religion, Politics, and Public Opinion

Lives of Adventure, Fulfillment, and Service

The X-Files and the Enlightenment Myth

How to Vote for the President

Humanitarian ‘Impulses’ vs. Convictions

Putin’s Brezhnev Doctrine

The U.N.’s Human Rights Charade

Featured Resource from the Fellows

Cover image via AmazonThe Rise of Global Civil Society: Building Communities and Nations from the Bottom Up by Don Eberly.

A sweeping and hopeful overview of the extraordinary new forces that are prying open closed societies and cultivating democratic norms across the globe.

Gleanings Quick Links

The Real Digital Revolution: Social networking is changing the marketing landscape: “Brand advertising can’t stretch the truth anymore or try and gild the lily. Because if it does, we’re going to find out about it, find out that you’ve been lying to us all along about extras that don’t work and specials that aren’t special. And our reaction is not going to be pretty.” (Alan Wolk, AdWeek; h/t: Ryan Moede • 2008 08 27)

Après Lewis: ‘As it turns out, Tim Keller’s “The Reason for God” (2008), the book recommended by my friend, is the best of the “Mere Christianity” wannabes. Mr. Keller argues that the usual objections to Christianity—that it is a straitjacket, that there cannot be just one true religion—are themselves the product of a particular (secular Western) point of view. He then builds an affirmative case for Christianity, suggesting that the Big Bang and our appreciation of beauty are clues pointing to God and that Christ’s resurrection was so unlikely both to Greeks and Romans (who viewed the material world as weak and corrupt) and to Jews (who expected any resurrection to come at the end of time) that it cannot be dismissed as the clever marketing strategy of a new religion. If this sounds a little like N.T. Wright, it isn’t accidental: Mr. Keller draws liberally from him, as well as Lewis, Christian philosopher Alvin Plantinga (a professor at Notre Dame) and others. “The Reason for God” is as sensible and winsome as one would expect from the pastor of a latticework of churches that draw more than 5,000 attendees in New York City every Sunday, most of them young, single, urban professionals. But it too is no “Mere Christianity.” It does not have the original arguments or the magical prose of Lewis’s classic.’ (David Skeel, Wall Street Journal2008 08 15)

Alexander Solzhenitsyn: the line within: ‘Solzhenitsyn was far from endorsing the thesis of the “banality of evil” as Hannah Arendt had expounded it. Nor did he see totalitarianism as the ultimate source of the evil that it promotes. Rather totalitarian government is the great mistake, made for whatever noble or ignoble purpose, of putting the final goal before the present dilemma. It is this which gives evil intentions the same chance as good ones, which enables the criminal and the psychopath to compete on a level with the saint and the hero. Yet even in totalitarianism the evil belongs to the human beings, and not to the system. This is the remarkable message that Solzhenitsyn, crawling from the death-machine, carried pressed to his heart.’ (Senior Fellow Roger Scruton, in openDemocracy2008 08 11)

Atheism and Evil: Could it possibly improve things to believe that the long pain of human evolution was set in motion by chance alone? The atheist view of the world is actually rather bleaker than that of Jews and Christians: Suffering under the weight of evil is meaningless, and so is any struggle against evil. Everything in the atheist’s world begins and ends in randomness and chance. Few atheists seem to be as rigorously honest as Friedrich Nietzsche, who warned that if God is dead, it is wishful thinking to hold that reason alone can confer “meaning” on life. Reason has been outmoded by chance. (Michael Novak, First Things: On the Square2008 07 29)

Christopher Nolan’s Achievement: The Dark Knight (2008 07 22)
Unplanned Parenthood (2008 07 21)
What makes a supervillain? (2008 07 19)
Pope’s Speech at Barangaroo (2008 07 17)
Hollywood’s Hero Deficit (2008 07 17)

more . . .

Other Resources from the Fellows

Cover image via AmazonThe New England Soul: Preaching and Religious Culture in Colonial New England by Harry S. Stout.

The New England Soul is the first comprehensive analysis of preaching in New England from the founding of the Puritan colonies to the outbreak of the Revolution.