The World of Total Work

A ReviewDan Russ

book cover imageLeisure: The Basis of Culture by Josef Pieper, Translated by Gerard Malsbary with an introduction by Roger Scruton (St. Augustine’s Press [1948] 1998), $12.

Work is consuming our lives and—Josef Pieper would say—our humanity. I have recently observed cases of two disturbing instances of what Pieper calls the “world of total work.” The first is among friends and colleagues who are wired for vacations. By this I mean that they either choose or are expected to take their cell phones and laptops with them on vacations. They do so either because they are concerned about what their superiors or colleagues would think if they ignored the demands of the office, or because they fear missing something or someone that might be crucial to their professional lives. Indeed, a friend recently observed that as she and her husband take their annual pilgrimage to the shore, each year the beaches and coffee shops are increasingly filled with people on cell phones and laptops, doing business.

The second disturbing symptom of the “world of total work” can be seen in the obsessive ways we program and organize the lives of our children. Parents do it by signing them up for sports leagues, music lessons, scouts—anything that will keep them busy, off the streets, and give them (hopefully) a competitive edge. Schools do it with those reform movements that worry about “time on task”; many districts have in recent years reduced or abolished recess, the arts, and even some athletics. Most of this is driven by the real or perceived need to improve test scores, not only to evaluate the schools themselves but also so that we can sort and advance students—and so that they can be “productive” members of society. Indeed, the term most often used for the national movement to reform education into the likeness of business is the “accountability movement,” a term once used for measuring profit and loss.

Pieper (1904–1997), a German Catholic philosopher, foresaw our world. He warned us about the character of the world that was emerging after World War II, a world with no honor or place for the classical Christian understanding of leisure. Leisure: The Basis of Culture was first given as a lecture in the summer of 1947 and published in German in 1948. It is his description and critique of post-war Europe’s obsession with the business of rebuilding European society in such a way that everybody and every act must be practical and “useful.” How accurately this describes the global economy that pervades our world with its emphasis on productivity, profit, and doing away with “downtime.”

In contrast, Pieper reminds us that the very root and origin of classical and Christian culture has been to honor and make “a space of true leisure.” For example, the Latin root of our word for school, scola, means leisure. In other words, school was originally conceived as a place where young people could learn and contemplate what it means to be fully human through poetry and philosophy, mathematics and the arts. Yes, most of them would someday learn to do something practical and make a living, but they would first and finally know the meaning and value of being human, which includes but more importantly transcends the practical and the functional. Pieper makes a clear distinction between the universities, which are increasingly centers that train specialists to function in the marketplace, and traditional education, which “is concerned with the whole” of life, not just how to practice law, medicine, or accounting. Indeed, he warns of the danger of using the terms “intellectual work” and “intellectual workers” to justify doing philosophy and to avoid the new stigma of being “purely academic.”

While he is clear that he does not in this essay propose a program by which we can mitigate or reverse this march toward the pragmatic and functional, he does hold out hope that we are able to recover places and times of authentic leisure. Indeed, he says that all leisure that marks the fullness of humanity is rooted in religious practice, in festival, and—at its highest—in the worship of God.

Pieper suggests that those who practice such worship are witnessing to another way of being in the world, a way that sees life as, first and finally, a gift, a way that sees grace as life’s deepest value. He suggests that worship, festival, and philosophy can point us to a way of life that returns work to its rightful place: “We work in order to be at leisure.” One real difference such a perspective makes is to enable us to recover the idea that we take holidays—holy days—in order to commune with the Creator, the creation, and our culture, not vacations, in order to recover from and rest up for work.

My only disappointment with this penetrating essay is that Pieper does not incorporate more reflections from the Hebrew Scriptures, which give us a deeper and different understanding of both work and leisure from that of the classical Greek perspective. Working with one’s hands, as the life of Jesus demonstrates, is honorable in Jewish understanding, but so is the study of Torah, the discussions at the synagogue and the city gates, and the holy days and pilgrimages that marked the Jewish calendar and formed the rhythms of life. In short, I wish he had reflected more upon the epigraph he quotes from Psalm 46: “Be at leisure—and know that I am God.”

This slim edition includes a second essay, “The Philosophical Act,” which, while worthwhile, is a heavier read. It also includes an excellent introduction by Trinity Forum Senior Fellow, Roger Scruton.  

Dan Russ is a Senior Fellow of The Trinity Forum and editor of its curriculum, Children of Prometheus. He directs the Center for Christian Studies at Gordon College.

Reviews, Arts and Culture, Business, Meaning and Calling, Society, Thu 06 Sep 2007

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

If we do not know some purpose for ourselves, we will not be able to fulfill that great Socratic admonition to “know ourselves,” for we cannot know even ourselves by knowing only ourselves.

James V. Schall, S.J., On the Unseriousness of Human Affairs

Site Services

Search:

Advanced Search

Member Login

Join the Site

Forgotten your password?

Send this Article to a Friend

Print this Article

Print without Comments

Recent Articles

Saying ‘I Don’t Know’

Strategic Cultural Thinking

New Approach to Muslim States?

The Financial Tsunami

A Faith-based Prime Minister

Forgive Us Our Debts

Electoral Politics: The Possibility of a ‘Perfect Storm’

Conservatism and Individualism

Religion, Elections, and Foreign Affairs

Redefining Democracy, Ethics, and Evangelicalism

Featured Resource

Cover image via AmazonReligion and American Foreign Policy, 1945–1960: The Soul of Containment by William Inboden.

Trinity Forum Board of Advisors member William Inboden argues that the poor response of churches to the Cold War led Truman and Eisenhower to construct a new civil religion.

Gleanings Quick Links

Stephen Fry in America: “Such Britons hug themselves with the thought that they are more cosmopolitan and sophisticated than Americans because they think they know more about geography and world culture, as if firstly being cosmopolitan and sophisticated can be scored in a quiz and as if secondly (and much more importantly) being cosmopolitan and sophisticated is in any way desirable or admirable to begin with. Sophistication is not a moral quality, nor is it a criterion by which one would choose one’s friends. Why do we like people? Because they are knowledgeable, cosmopolitan and sophisticated? No, because they are charming, kind, considerate, exciting to be with, amusing … there is a long list, but knowing what the capital of Kazakhstan is will not be on it.” (Stephen Fry’s blog post about his new book and BBC series. • 2008 10 10)

Give Me Liberty and Give Me Death: ‘I still cursed God, as we all do when we get bad news and pain. Not even the most faith-impaired among us shouts, “Damn quantum mechanics!” “Damn organic chemistry!” “Damn chaos and coincidence!”’ (P J O’Rourke, Search Magazine2008 09 30)

Give Me That Old-Time Religion: ‘This week revealed that when real money is on the line, even the left starts screaming for old-fashioned standards. Thus rose a shout for regulatory “oversight” of markets, and they don’t mean some vague, Googlie “don’t be evil.” They want tough, punishing rules. This won’t wash. You can’t claim, as holier-than-thou politics is now, that sending an army of regulatory storm-troopers into Wall Street will ensure integrity in mere bankers who themselves come from a broader, anything-goes culture.’ (Daniel Henninger, The Wall Street Journal • 2008 09 29)

The Real Digital Revolution: Social networking is changing the marketing landscape: “Brand advertising can’t stretch the truth anymore or try and gild the lily. Because if it does, we’re going to find out about it, find out that you’ve been lying to us all along about extras that don’t work and specials that aren’t special. And our reaction is not going to be pretty.” (Alan Wolk, AdWeek; h/t: Ryan Moede • 2008 08 27)

Après Lewis (2008 08 15)
Alexander Solzhenitsyn: the line within (2008 08 11)
Atheism and Evil (2008 07 29)
Christopher Nolan’s Achievement: The Dark Knight (2008 07 22)
Unplanned Parenthood (2008 07 21)

more . . .

Other Trinity Forum Resources

Wilberforce bookletWilliam Wilberforce: A Man Who Changed His Times by John Pollock, Foreword by J. Douglas Holladay.