A Web Gleanings Quick Link

TTF Staff

[The Fanatical Philosopher]

Benjamin A. Plotinsky, City Journal

Michel Onfray’s weak case against monotheism. A review. Of many good quotes, let's use this: “Even if all of Onfray’s links between religious texts and violence were supportable, why should we regard atheist or pagan violence as preferable to monotheist violence?”

Faiths and Worldviews, Fri 02 Feb 2007
our link to this entrygo to the article

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

External links are provided for information and reflection and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Trinity Forum or its affiliates.

The part of philanthropist is indeed a dangerous one; and the man who would do his neighbour good must first study how not to do him evil, and must begin by pulling the beam out of his own eye.

George MacDonald

Featured Resource

Cover image via AmazonQuestions of Truth: Responses to Questions about God, Science, and Belief by John Polkinghorne and Nicholas Beale.

Fifty-one responses plus reading lists and appendices make for a helpful resource on an important topic.

Site Services

Search:

Advanced Search

Member Login

Join the Site

Forgotten your password?

Recent Articles

Embracing Our Creative Limitations

Gollum as Everyman

Faith, on the evidence

Travels with Charley—and God

Choosing a New Way

Guroian and Guptara on Speaking of Faith

Miller interviewed on Corporate Morality

A useful exercise for leaders

The Romance of Socialism

Integrity in Science

Gleanings Quick Links

The Case for Working With Your Hands: “There probably aren’t many jobs that can be reduced to rule-following and still be done well. But in many jobs there is an attempt to do just this, and the perversity of it may go unnoticed by those who design the work process.” (Matthew Crawford, The New York Times2009 06 04)

Wanda Sykes, Al Franken and the Politics of Incivility: “So civility has an unavoidably moral component. The proper treatment of others conveys regard and demonstrates self-control. Rudeness sets out to dominate and humiliate. . . . Why does politics seem to numb this rudimentary moral sense?” (Michael Gerson, The Washington Post2009 05 15)

The Threat of Culture: Senior Fellow William Edgar: “Does the perversion of culture mean that the problem is culture itself? Although there are Christians who defend such a view, it is far off the mark…. It is never enough simply to decry the evils of the world, and then to offer salvation either as a way of warring against culture or as an escape from the world. In his Mars Hill speech, Paul reminds his listeners of the original purpose of history. God is the maker of the world and everything in it. He is to be worshiped as such.” (Gospel & Culture Project • 2009 03 25)

The New Humanism: Senior Fellow Roger Scruton: “The new humanism spends little time exalting man as an ideal. It says nothing, or next to nothing, about faith, hope, and charity; is scathing about patriotism; and is dismissive of those rearguard actions in defense of the family, public spirit, and sexual restraint that animated my parents. Instead of idealizing man, the new humanism denigrates God and attacks the belief in God as a human weakness. My parents too thought belief in God to be a weakness. But they were reluctant to deprive other human beings of a moral prop that they seemed to need.” (The American Spectator2009 03 25)

Knowing and finding (2009 03 20)
Obama’s Prayer Warriors (2009 03 18)
How Science Fiction Found Religion (2009 03 11)
Science and the Obama Administration (2009 03 05)
The Triumph of Banality (2009 03 04)

more . . .

Other Resources

Cover image via AmazonPorridge and Passion by Jonathan Aitken.

In this sequel to his first volume of autobiography, Pride and Perjury, Aitken starts his story as he is taken down from the courtroom and incarcerated at Her Majesty’s Pleasure.

facebook link