Peter Edman
Senior Fellow Joseph Loconte had an article in the Friday November 4 edition of the Wall Street Journal that is worth noting.
In ”Peace Now: Christian pacifists ignore the true ambitions of terrorists,” Loconte, ever the equal opportunity critic, addresses the theological and practical problems attending a certain current variant of Christian pacifism, which calls for peace at all costs. Unfortunately, its unconsidered costs include truth—and logic. In addition to being essentially futile, this position is fundamentally disrespectful to the enemy as well, suggesting that terrorists and others really don’t know what they want and would quiet down if we were nicer to them:
Any religious critique of terrorism that fails to acknowledge these ambitions is deeply impoverished. It produces a political theology that helps to rationalize terrorist rage. It refuses to distinguish between the acts of murderers and the use of government force to stop them. . . .
Christians have never viewed peace as the highest good. There are other goods: protecting human dignity and restraining evil, for example. A just peace can be the final result of these pursuits, God willing. But if peace is made the supreme goal, if it consumes all other virtues, it becomes an idol--and a snare to the statesman as well as the saint.
People interested in the topic will probably find much worth pondering in Loconte’s recent book, The End of Illusions.
Sightings, Faiths and Worldviews, Good and Evil, Public Square, Tue 08 Nov 2005
When you have to make a choice and don't make it, that is in itself a choice.
William James