Redefining Democracy, Ethics, and Evangelicalism

a columnThu 04 Sep 2008 • Responses: 0 • by Joseph Loconte

Joe Loconte

In the current issue of The New Yorker, Peter Boyer wonders whether Barack Obama and the Democratic Party can capture the votes of supposedly disaffected conservative Christians, both Catholics and Protestants. Political strategists, of course, are wondering the same. Yet the article, “Party Faithful: Can the Democrats Get a Foothold on the Religious Vote?” treats recent political history as clumsily as it does Christian eschatology. It seems to be an essay on an eager, yet ultimately fruitless quest for a thesis.

story continues arrow, read more Read the whole entry (624 more words)

A New Kind of Culture War

Wed 03 Sep 2008 • Responses: 0 • by Joseph Loconte

Joe Loconte

Last year National Review published an article called, “A Farewell to Culture Wars.” That editorial decision, to borrow a line from Ronald Reagan, must now be consigned to the ash heap of history. The moral arguments about the dignity of the unborn and the nature of the family, which have helped inflame our national politics for over three decades, could never be glossed over by happy talk. Exhibit A: The choice of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, a conservative Christian, as the Republican nominee for vice president. 

story continues arrow, read more Read the whole entry (355 more words)

A European Challenge to Anti-Americanism

a columnMon 01 Sep 2008 • Responses: 0 • by Joseph Loconte

Joe Loconte

For the better part of a decade, pollsters, pundits, and politicians have beaten the drums of anti-Americanism with a flamboyance that would rival Big Band legends Buddy Rich and Gene Krupa. Last week, however, America’s friends from across the Atlantic announced an initiative to pound back.

A group of British conservatives has launched America in the World, a London-based international alliance to combat anti-Americanism. Armed with briefings, polling data, policy analysis, and high-level political endorsements, America in the World seeks to become the most important fact-driven resource for people willing to entertain the case against anti-Americanism. The effort is the brainchild of Tim Montgomerie, founder and editor of the influential political website ConservativeHome, and Stephan Shakespeare, the founder of YouGov, a prestigious opinion-polling company in Britain.

story continues arrow, read more Read the whole entry (635 more words)

Religion, Politics, and Public Opinion

Fri 29 Aug 2008 • Responses: 0 • by Joseph Loconte

Joe Loconte A recent public opinion poll shows that a narrow majority of Americans do not want churches and other houses of worship to speak out on social and political matters—a reversal of previous surveys showing majority support for church engagement. Conducted by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life, the survey suggests that the souring mood can mostly be attributed to conservatives. Four years ago, according to Pew, just 30 percent of conservatives believed that churches and other houses of worship should stay out of politics. Today, 50 percent of conservatives express this view. Pew pollsters then go on to make this brazen claim: “The sharp divisions between Republicans and Democrats that previously existed on this issue have disappeared.

story continues arrow, read more Read the whole entry (286 more words)

Lives of Adventure, Fulfillment, and Service

Thu 28 Aug 2008 • Responses: 0 • by Christopher Gergen and Gregg Vanourek

book cover image

Some people don’t just live a life, they lead a life. They don’t sit around waiting for a lucky break. They create opportunities for themselves. They go after their dreams and bring them to life. Rather than bending to the status quo, they change it. As with any great effort, their work is never done but ever-evolving, and it is often inspiring to those around them.

Welcome to the territory of life entrepreneurs.

story continues arrow, read more Read the whole entry (343 more words)

The X-Files and the Enlightenment Myth

a columnTue 26 Aug 2008 • Responses: 0 • by Joseph Loconte

Joe Loconte

If there is one notion that has catapulted into popularity in the post-9/11 era, it is that religious belief is the iniquitous inspiration for the world’s repression and violence. The unexamined assumption is that reason, human rights, and democracy are the ripened fruit of secularism and the Enlightenment. This is what animates authors such as Christopher Hitchens when he claims “religion poisons everything.” It has become a best-selling theme.

A shorthand version of this idea goes like this: the decline of revealed religion leads to human freedom that leads to human flourishing. End of story. How can a viewpoint so manifestly at odds with history be held so passionately, so reflexively, by so many?

story continues arrow, read more Read the whole entry (658 more words)

How to Vote for the President

FeatureWed 20 Aug 2008 • Responses: 1 • by William Edgar

photo by greywulf (Flickr, CC license)

Character, discernment, trust

Senior Fellow William Edgar looks at the factors we should consider in the upcoming U.S. elections—or any election, for that matter.

story continues arrow, read more Read this article (1389 words)

Humanitarian ‘Impulses’ vs. Convictions

Wed 20 Aug 2008 • Responses: 0 • by Joseph Loconte

Joe Loconte

Writing in last Sunday’s New York Times Magazine, Princeton professor Gary Bass observes that despite the ongoing crisis in the Darfur region of Sudan and the difficulties in the U.S.-led war in Iraq, “the idea of humanitarian intervention remains intact.”

In his essay, “Humanitarian Impulses: Why Interventions Aren’t Going Away,” Mr. Bass argues that the concept of military intervention to stop ethnic cleansing and genocide is as much a European idea as an American one:

story continues arrow, read more Read the whole entry (326 more words)

Putin’s Brezhnev Doctrine

a columnWed 20 Aug 2008 • Responses: 1 • by David Aikman

logo

Forty years ago this August, all of Europe and the U.S. watched with horror as the Soviet army, in conjunction with units from four of its Warsaw Pact allies, rolled into Czechoslovakia to crush the “Prague Spring.” The “Spring” had been a dramatic movement for reform and liberalization of Czechoslovakia’s Communist system that had been introduced by Czech Communist leader Alexander Dubcek and some others.

The 200,000 invading troops met only token resistance, because Dubcek had ordered Czech citizens not to oppose the invasion. But in a singular act of brutal humiliation, Dubcek and his associates were transported to Moscow in chains in the belly of a Soviet cargo plane, then made to face the bullying shouts of the assembled Soviet Politburo. Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev’s rationale for the invasion became known as the “Brezhnev doctrine,” a principle that Communist Party control of the countries of Eastern Europe should never have to submit to reforms that might bring capitalism and democracy to them.

story continues arrow, read more Read the whole entry (1154 more words)

The U.N.’s Human Rights Charade

Wed 13 Aug 2008 • Responses: 0 • by Joseph Loconte

Joe Loconte

The Geneva-based U.N. Watch has just released its critique of the tenure of former U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour. Entitled, “The Right to Name and Shame,” the report offers a clear-eyed look at the record of the U.N.’s most prestigious human-rights official. Sadly—but predictably—Ms. Arbour’s performance, painstakingly examined, receives mixed reviews:

story continues arrow, read more Read the whole entry (280 more words)

Page 1 of 26.  1 2 3 >  Last »

As modern people, we have too much to live with and too little to live for.

Os Guinness

Site Services

Search:

Advanced Search

Member Login

Join the Site

Forgotten your password?

Recent Articles

Redefining Democracy, Ethics, and Evangelicalism

A New Kind of Culture War

A European Challenge to Anti-Americanism

Religion, Politics, and Public Opinion

Lives of Adventure, Fulfillment, and Service

The X-Files and the Enlightenment Myth

How to Vote for the President

Humanitarian ‘Impulses’ vs. Convictions

Putin’s Brezhnev Doctrine

The U.N.’s Human Rights Charade

Featured Resource

Cover image via AmazonOrthodoxy: The Romance of Faith by G. K. Chesterton.

On its 100th anniversary, this book is just as helpful and provocative as ever.

Gleanings Quick Links

The Real Digital Revolution: Social networking is changing the marketing landscape: “Brand advertising can’t stretch the truth anymore or try and gild the lily. Because if it does, we’re going to find out about it, find out that you’ve been lying to us all along about extras that don’t work and specials that aren’t special. And our reaction is not going to be pretty.” (Alan Wolk, AdWeek; h/t: Ryan Moede • 2008 08 27)

Après Lewis: ‘As it turns out, Tim Keller’s “The Reason for God” (2008), the book recommended by my friend, is the best of the “Mere Christianity” wannabes. Mr. Keller argues that the usual objections to Christianity—that it is a straitjacket, that there cannot be just one true religion—are themselves the product of a particular (secular Western) point of view. He then builds an affirmative case for Christianity, suggesting that the Big Bang and our appreciation of beauty are clues pointing to God and that Christ’s resurrection was so unlikely both to Greeks and Romans (who viewed the material world as weak and corrupt) and to Jews (who expected any resurrection to come at the end of time) that it cannot be dismissed as the clever marketing strategy of a new religion. If this sounds a little like N.T. Wright, it isn’t accidental: Mr. Keller draws liberally from him, as well as Lewis, Christian philosopher Alvin Plantinga (a professor at Notre Dame) and others. “The Reason for God” is as sensible and winsome as one would expect from the pastor of a latticework of churches that draw more than 5,000 attendees in New York City every Sunday, most of them young, single, urban professionals. But it too is no “Mere Christianity.” It does not have the original arguments or the magical prose of Lewis’s classic.’ (David Skeel, Wall Street Journal2008 08 15)

Alexander Solzhenitsyn: the line within: ‘Solzhenitsyn was far from endorsing the thesis of the “banality of evil” as Hannah Arendt had expounded it. Nor did he see totalitarianism as the ultimate source of the evil that it promotes. Rather totalitarian government is the great mistake, made for whatever noble or ignoble purpose, of putting the final goal before the present dilemma. It is this which gives evil intentions the same chance as good ones, which enables the criminal and the psychopath to compete on a level with the saint and the hero. Yet even in totalitarianism the evil belongs to the human beings, and not to the system. This is the remarkable message that Solzhenitsyn, crawling from the death-machine, carried pressed to his heart.’ (Senior Fellow Roger Scruton, in openDemocracy2008 08 11)

Atheism and Evil: Could it possibly improve things to believe that the long pain of human evolution was set in motion by chance alone? The atheist view of the world is actually rather bleaker than that of Jews and Christians: Suffering under the weight of evil is meaningless, and so is any struggle against evil. Everything in the atheist’s world begins and ends in randomness and chance. Few atheists seem to be as rigorously honest as Friedrich Nietzsche, who warned that if God is dead, it is wishful thinking to hold that reason alone can confer “meaning” on life. Reason has been outmoded by chance. (Michael Novak, First Things: On the Square2008 07 29)

Christopher Nolan’s Achievement: The Dark Knight (2008 07 22)
Unplanned Parenthood (2008 07 21)
What makes a supervillain? (2008 07 19)
Pope’s Speech at Barangaroo (2008 07 17)
Hollywood’s Hero Deficit (2008 07 17)

more . . .

Other Resources

Cover image via AmazonTime for Truth: Living Free in a World of Lies, Hype, and Spin .